[macstl-dev] gcc 3.3 on YellowDogLinux
leblanc at skycomputers.com
Fri Apr 1 21:40:09 WST 2005
On Apr 1, 2005, at 8:04 AM, Glen Low wrote:
> We'll have to change all the vector bool and pixel to __bool and
> __pixel respectively (no fence required).
I did that in my copy.
>> It's OK by me to use 3.4, but my bosses want to avoid building
>> another GCC. I'll ask.
> Is this work for your company, SkyComputers? Embedded processors?
Yes. Although they are techically "embedded", they run YDL out of the
>> Unfortunately it still traps at run-time.
> Need to determine where the trap happens. Does YDL (1) turn Java mode
> on or off, (2) have denormal handlers? (if either Java mode is on OR
> you don't have denormal handlers, then the problem lies somewhere
> else. What kind of trap, which line of code etc.)
I have been trying test/benchmark and isolated the fault to the
destructor of the "stdext" phase of each sub-benchmark. Without that,
it runs to the end. Did I just comment out the Altivec test?
More information about the macstl-dev