[macstl-dev] Opteron benchmarks
Glen Low
glen.low at pixelglow.com
Sun Jul 10 19:22:48 WST 2005
Hi All
While waiting for macstl 0.3.1, you might be interested in the latest
macstl benchmarks. A quad 2.6GHz Opteron (AMD64) landed in my day job
the other day and I had to compile macstl and run it on the beast.
First, using the old Visual Studio C++ 2003 which produces 32-bit
code. For the key to these values, look at our last benchmarks:
http://www.pixelglow.com/stories/macintel-faster-than-altivec/
MA 1,282 1.6x
IP 3,226 7.5x
Poly 709 1.2x
Hypot 279 3.1x
Trig 24.7 3.2x
Next I used Visual Studio C++ 2005 Beta 2 which still produces 32-bit
code. There is a restriction on benchmarking .NET Framework code, but
since no MSIL was harmed in this procedure, I should be in the clear.
MA 1,075 5.7x
IP 1,282 8.0x
Poly 917 4.3x
Hypot 279 4.0x
Trig 31.4 8.9x
Now for the piece de resistance. I flicked on 64-bit code aka x64 aka
x86-64 aka EM64T. The main benefit for macstl will be the additional
registers over the register-starved 32-bit ISA.
MA 2,128 3.3x
IP -- crash --
Poly 1,282 2.6x
Hypot 291 5.1x
Trig 42.7 9.8x
The multiply-add was 98% faster and the trig test was 36% faster than
over 32-bit code.
Versus the 3.4GHz Xeon, the Opteron draw even on the trig test while
it was 3x faster on the multiply-add.
Versus the 2.0GHz G5, the Operton was about 60% of the trig test
speed while it almost drew even on the multiply-add.
Cheers, Glen Low
---
pixelglow software | simply brilliant stuff
www.pixelglow.com
aim: pixglen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pixelglow.com/lists/archive/macstl-dev/attachments/20050710/76781cc1/attachment.html
More information about the macstl-dev
mailing list