[macstl-dev] Questions on valarray use : non-aligned buffers
Ilya Lipovsky
lipovsky at skycomputers.com
Sat Sep 24 21:15:04 WST 2005
Can I propose yet another way of naming?
How about renaming the already existing refarray into "aligned_refarray"
and naming the upcoming one as "refarray". Sometimes, I think, it's
necessary to break the API (which should be ok here as it's very recent)
to do things right rather than be constantly confused later on.
-Ilya
P.S. if not, then arbarray should do it. I don't think you want to make
the names similar (for the aligned and the "unknown alignment"
versions), since this can confuse future novices.
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Glen Low wrote:
> All:
>
> It seems the front runner for the name of the thing is arbarray (Ilya +
> Andrew).
>
> Thought I'd throw one more name suggestion into the ring: urefarray for
> unaligned reference array. This shows its commonality with refarray i.e. that
> both copy references and not copy values, and a "u" suffix or prefix is
> common enough in SSE code.
>
> Awaiting thy verdict :-)
>
>
>
>
> Cheers, Glen Low
>
>
> ---
> pixelglow software | simply brilliant stuff
> www.pixelglow.com
> aim: pixglen
>
>
More information about the macstl-dev
mailing list