[macstl-dev] Questions on valarray use : non-aligned buffers

Ilya Lipovsky lipovsky at skycomputers.com
Sat Sep 24 21:15:04 WST 2005

  • Previous message: [macstl-dev] Questions on valarray use : non-aligned buffers
  • Next message: [macstl-dev] Questions on valarray use : non-aligned buffers
  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]


Can I propose yet another way of naming?

How about renaming the already existing refarray into "aligned_refarray" 
and naming the upcoming one as "refarray". Sometimes, I think, it's 
necessary to break the API (which should be ok here as it's very recent) 
to do things right rather than be constantly confused later on.

-Ilya

P.S. if not, then arbarray should do it. I don't think you want to make 
the names similar (for the aligned and the "unknown alignment"
versions), since this can confuse future novices.

  On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Glen Low wrote:

> All:
>
> It seems the front runner for the name of the thing is arbarray (Ilya + 
> Andrew).
>
> Thought I'd throw one more name suggestion into the ring: urefarray for 
> unaligned reference array. This shows its commonality with refarray i.e. that 
> both copy references and not copy values, and a "u" suffix or prefix is 
> common enough in SSE code.
>
> Awaiting thy verdict :-)
>
>
>
>
> Cheers, Glen Low
>
>
> ---
> pixelglow software | simply brilliant stuff
> www.pixelglow.com
> aim: pixglen
>
>



  • Previous message: [macstl-dev] Questions on valarray use : non-aligned buffers
  • Next message: [macstl-dev] Questions on valarray use : non-aligned buffers
  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the macstl-dev mailing list